You do not need to know whether your case is EU261, UK261, APPR, DOT or something else. Enter the journey once. AeroDue checks the route, operating carrier, problem and the verified legal coverage currently available before it shows a conclusion.
Check my journeyA country having passenger-rights law does not mean AeroDue is already allowed to issue an automatic legal conclusion there. We separate the existence of a regime from the current publication status of our deterministic engine.
Available for supported European-rule situations. The checker still decides applicability from the actual journey; CE261 is not a worldwide rule.
Supported deterministic rules are currently publishable when the journey facts and source-health gates pass.Current verified AeroDue subset: flight-delay compensation on departures from Great Britain. Other UK scenarios remain outside this narrow activation.
Only a specifically reviewed subset is currently publishable; the rest stays closed.Canada has its own APPR regime. AeroDue is validating the deterministic mapping and keeps passenger-specific automatic conclusions closed for now.
Official material is being monitored or mapped, but automatic legal conclusions remain closed until the deterministic gates pass.US rights are issue-specific. AeroDue does not copy the European fixed-delay model into US journeys; refund, denied-boarding and other DOT rights require their own mapping.
Official material is being monitored or mapped, but automatic legal conclusions remain closed until the deterministic gates pass.Brazil has its own ANAC framework. Source and mapping work is still under validation before AeroDue can publish deterministic passenger-specific conclusions.
Official material is being monitored or mapped, but automatic legal conclusions remain closed until the deterministic gates pass.Australian consumer protections work differently from CE261. AeroDue is validating the applicable consumer-rights mapping before automatic conclusions are published.
Official material is being monitored or mapped, but automatic legal conclusions remain closed until the deterministic gates pass.The Montreal Convention can matter in international transport, especially for baggage and proven delay damage. Liability limits are not automatic payouts.
The framework may be relevant, but AeroDue does not currently issue a general automatic conclusion for it.Mexico, Colombia, Chile, India, China and other jurisdictions can have their own passenger-rights rules. Route recognition is not the same as deterministic legal coverage.
The framework may be relevant, but AeroDue does not currently issue a general automatic conclusion for it.The checker uses the current Rights Engine publication state, not a marketing country count. If a source becomes stale or a rule falls out of its safety gate, the dependent conclusion is suppressed.
These are simplified examples to show why AeroDue starts with the journey rather than asking you to choose a law. The checker applies the current supported rules to the facts you provide.
European passenger-rights rules may be relevant because the journey departs from the EU, even when the destination is outside Europe.
The European-rule analysis can change with the operating carrier. Reversing the direction is not legally identical.
US federal passenger rights work differently. A long delay does not automatically create the same fixed compensation table used in Europe.
The result should tell you what the system can support — including when the answer is no, incomplete or outside current deterministic coverage.
A supported verified rule matches the facts. AeroDue can show the relevant right and, where safely calculable, a potential value.
The checked facts do not satisfy a supported compensation rule. That does not automatically remove refund, care, expenses or baggage rights.
A fact that can change eligibility is missing. AeroDue keeps the conclusion open instead of turning an unknown into a yes or a no.
The journey may involve a real legal regime, but AeroDue does not yet have enough validated deterministic coverage to issue the passenger-specific conclusion safely.
Compensation is only one category. Depending on the journey and the supported regime, a passenger may still need to check other rights separately.
The interface language and the passenger’s nationality do not decide the legal answer. The Rights Engine works from journey facts and current verified coverage.
Origin, destination and the direction of travel can change territorial scope.
In some regimes, who actually operates the flight can change whether a rule applies.
Delay, cancellation, denied boarding, refund, expenses and baggage can trigger different rights.
Arrival delay, notice periods and other time facts can change the outcome.
When the reason or another eligibility fact is unknown, AeroDue does not invent it.
A result only appears when its source, version, applicability and deterministic publication gates are healthy.
Tell AeroDue what happened. The checker will determine which currently supported rules are relevant, what may be recoverable, what is not eligible and what still cannot be concluded safely.