AeroDue Journal

Editorial standards

How the AeroDue Journal decides what to publish, how every claim is checked and how mistakes are corrected.

Check my journey

Free check · No account required

Official sources first

Reports are built on official primary sources tracked by the AeroDue Disruption Radar: airports, airlines, aviation and transport authorities and official strike registers. A news item needs an official source or two independent sources.

Publisher evidence and claim checks

Reports use identified official sources; facts and numbers are cross-checked during preparation. Any unresolved claim must be qualified or omitted.

How editions are prepared

Editions are prepared by the AeroDue Editorial Desk with AI assistance, from the official sources cited in each article, and published under AeroDue's editorial responsibility.

Facts and interpretation are separated

Radar reports and news state confirmed, dated facts. Analysis is clearly labelled as interpretation.

No promises about compensation

Articles explain how passenger-rights rules generally work. They never state that a passenger is entitled to compensation: that depends on the actual flight, carrier, route and cause. AeroDue does not decide or handle claims.

Updates, corrections and withdrawals

When the Radar re-checks an event, the article says so. Corrections are published as new revisions with a visible editorial history. A withdrawn article keeps a public notice with the reason, and its text is no longer distributed.

Independence

Journal articles are not sponsored, and the article text contains no affiliate links.

Report an error

Found something wrong? Write to press@aerodue.com with the article link. Verified corrections are published as a new revision.

AeroDue Journal →